It should be expected by anyone who knows anything about
Virginia law that expungement is a narrowly-tailored process that is not meant
for everyone. After all, the Commonwealth is historically very conservative
when it comes to matters involving her criminal justice system. Luckily, we can
take a crack at explaining the nuts and bolts of the process a few short pages.
For those readers who do not know, expungement is a process
by which an individual petitions the Court to close off records of an alleged
prior criminal offense and make those records unavailable for public view.
Essentially, expungement is a tool that can be used to remove any remaining
stigma of criminal process that a person may be suffering as the result of an
arrest. However, not every charge may be expunged in Virginia.
First, one has to determine if the charge seeking to be
expunged is eligible. Under Virginia law, only three types of outcomes to a
criminal case are eligible: 1. If the charge went to trial and an acquittal was
entered; 2. If a nolle prosequi (to not prosecute) was granted on the
Commonwealth’s motion; or 3. If the charge was “otherwise dismissed.” Therefore,
if the charge in question went to trial and the defendant was found “not guilty,”
then the charge is eligible for expungement. Also, if the defendant and his/her
attorney attended court and the Commonwealth chose to nolle prosse the case,
then that charge is also eligible for expungement. Finally, if the charge
proceeded to a hearing and a dismissal was entered, it would be expungable.
All that being said, the “otherwise dismissed” eligibility
route does NOT include dismissals by deferred finding or suspended imposition of
sentence. Essentially, to simplify the distinction, there should be no plea and
no finding. The legislature seemingly was contemplating a dismissal as a result
of a motion to suppress or a motion to strike when they included this language
in the statute. Additionally, the legislature specifically included dismissal
by accord and satisfaction as a viable outcome for expungement when drafting
the statute. Bottom line: if your understanding of the outcome in your case is
that the charge was “dismissed,” you should probably consult with an attorney
to figure out whether or not you meet the eligibility requirements.
Although it is a relatively novel idea, Virginia law has
made certain cases eligible for “partial expungement.” In cases where a person
is charged with one criminal offense but the charge happens to get amended to
that of a criminal offense that is NOT a “lesser-included offense,” then the
original charge is eligible for expungement. For example, if a person is arrested
and charged with Grand Larceny and on their court date the charge is amended to
Trespassing, then the record for the arrest for Grand Larceny would be eligible
for expungement. In contrast, if that same Grand Larceny was instead amended to
a charge of Petit Larceny, then it would NOT be eligible for expungement
because Petit Larceny is a lesser-included offense of Grand Larceny. Take note
that if this “partial expungement” ends up being successful, then only the
arrest record of the original charge gets sealed. Thus, the remaining
conviction (in our example, for Trespassing) would still remain.
Assuming that a charge meets the eligibility requirements,
one should turn their attention next to the type of charge (misdemeanor or
felony) and any prior criminal record held by the petitioner seeking
expungement. The reason that this is important is because Virginia law allows
for a presumption for expungement in cases where the charge sought to be
expunged is a misdemeanor offense and the petitioner has no prior criminal
record.
If the charge is a felony, the petitioner has a prior
criminal record, or both, then the petitioner will need to show that the continued
existence of this charge on his/her record causes or may cause a “manifest
injustice.” In other words, under this set of circumstances, the petitioner has
to convince the Circuit Court judge that the continued existence of the arrest
record is harming or may harm their ability to proceed with their lives as
planned. The judge may also require the petitioner to show manifest injustice
in cases of “partial expungements” discussed above. As you can imagine, these
are the scenarios where an attorney is an absolute must.
On your hearing date, the judge will determine whether or
not to grant the petition for expungement. If the petition is granted, then an
order will be sent to the Department of the State Police, who will oversee the
sealing of records. Upon completion of this process, the Department of State
Police will produce and mail a letter to the petitioner or his/her attorney
stating that the expungement has been complete. The process from initial filing
to closure letter can take varying amounts of time depending on the type of
case, the home jurisdiction, and volume of expungements at that particular
time.
As one can glean from this primer on the topic, expungements
have a lot of working parts and can be difficult at times. Though legal counsel
is not necessary, it is advisable to seek assistance from an attorney who has a
strong knowledge of how expungements work and how to best make them work.
Remember that like any service industry, we take care of this stuff for you so
that you don’t have to.